True leadership often involves prioritizing the greater good over political expediency. Governor Ron DeSantis's clash with Disney exemplifies this principle, offering a glimpse into his leadership style as he prepares for a potential presidential bid.

Disney, a powerful force in Florida politics, had enjoyed a long-standing, mutually beneficial relationship with state officials. This changed with DeSantis's governorship. His decision to challenge Disney's special status, particularly after their public opposition to Florida's Parental Rights in Education bill, demonstrated a willingness to confront powerful interests, even at potential political cost.

While some criticized DeSantis's actions as politically motivated, his supporters viewed them as a bold challenge to corporate overreach and a defense of parental rights. The move sparked a national debate about the role of corporations in politics and the balance between business interests and social values.

The situation escalated with Disney's subsequent actions and the return of former CEO Bob Iger. DeSantis's response raised fundamental questions: Why should a multinational corporation receive preferential treatment? Why should Disney effectively function as a quasi-governmental entity within Florida?

DeSantis argued that previous Florida governors, both Republican and Democrat, had allowed this situation to persist. He positioned himself as a disruptor, aiming to level the playing field and dismantle what he perceived as crony capitalism. This resonated with voters who felt that large corporations wielded undue influence in government.

DeSantis's actions contrast sharply with the approach of other Republicans, including former President Donald Trump. Critics argue that Trump, despite his populist rhetoric, failed to effectively address corporate influence and the rise of "woke" ideology during his presidency. Some even accused him of hypocrisy for criticizing DeSantis's stance on Disney.

DeSantis's supporters see his willingness to take on Disney as evidence of genuine conviction and a commitment to his principles. They believe this distinguishes him from other politicians who prioritize political maneuvering over decisive action. Whether this approach will resonate with voters on a national scale remains to be seen.