With the Western US bracing for a hot, dry Fourth of July weekend, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) has recommended alternatives to traditional fireworks to mitigate wildfire risks. Suggestions included festive options like noisemakers, glow sticks, outdoor movies, and even red, white, and blue silly string. The USFS emphasized the importance of fire safety during this high-risk period, urging everyone to "do their part to prevent human-caused wildfires."

However, the recommendation of silly string, a non-biodegradable plastic aerosol product, sparked controversy among environmentalists. Some pointed to existing bans on the product due to its environmental impact and potential for misuse. Historically, cities like Los Angeles have restricted silly string use due to issues with discarded cans, street litter, and clogged gutters. Other municipalities have cited damage to property, further fueling the debate.

Environmental advocates expressed concern over the USFS's recommendation. Rebecca Sobel of WildEarth Guardians highlighted the need for increased awareness regarding chemicals in everyday products, questioning the agency's choice. While acknowledging the difficulty in tracking the composition of all products, she suggested the USFS should have exercised greater caution.

George Ducker, a spokesperson for the State Forestry Division, clarified that the silly string suggestion was intended for children and young people as a safer alternative to fireworks on private property, not for use in forests. He emphasized the importance of responsible practices, including proper garbage disposal and adherence to quiet hours.

In response to growing fire risks and air quality concerns, several cities, including areas of New Mexico, Colorado, San Diego, and Salt Lake City, have opted to replace traditional firework displays with drone shows. Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall highlighted the importance of adapting to safer technologies while still maintaining the celebratory spirit of the holiday.