Former President Trump's recent assertions about China controlling the Panama Canal have been refuted by both the Panama Canal Authority and the Panamanian president. These claims, made during a press conference and on social media, sparked controversy and raised concerns about international relations and economic security.

Ricaurte Vásquez Morales, head of the Panama Canal Authority, firmly denied any Chinese involvement in the canal's operations, emphasizing the canal's adherence to international neutrality treaties. He warned that any discrimination against specific nations would violate these agreements and lead to significant disruption.

Trump's remarks also touched upon the historical context of the canal, referencing the Torrijos-Carter Treaties signed in the 1970s. He criticized the decision to transfer control of the canal to Panama, calling it a mistake that contributed to Carter's election loss. Despite this criticism, Trump acknowledged Carter as a "good man."

Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino also dismissed Trump's claims, labeling them as "nonsense" and reaffirming Panama's ownership and control of the canal. He stated unequivocally that there are no Chinese soldiers present at the canal and that any discussion of reclaiming the canal is out of the question.

While Trump's statements have been widely refuted, they highlight underlying concerns about China's growing global influence, particularly its investments in strategic infrastructure. General Laura J. Richardson, head of U.S. Southern Command, has testified before Congress about China's increasing involvement in ports and other critical infrastructure projects, including those related to the Panama Canal. She warned that these investments, while presented as peaceful, could potentially grant China strategic access in the future.

It's worth noting that two major seaports flanking the Panama Canal are operated by Hutchison Ports PPC, a Hong Kong-based company. Given the increasing application of Chinese national security laws in Hong Kong, some have expressed concerns about potential implications for these ports and the flow of goods through the canal. A significant portion of U.S. container traffic passes through this vital waterway, underscoring its importance to global trade.